Rights of way public notices

For public path orders (diversions, extinguishments and creations), reasons for objecting to an order could include:

• a proposed new path would be substantially less convenient than the existing path (it is helpful if you state the reasons why you think this is the case)
• a path proposed for closure is still needed for public use
• a proposed new path is not wide enough

For definitive map modification orders the tests for making an order are solely about whether the evidence does or does not justify a change to the definitive map. An objection to a definitive map modification order must:

• clearly state the grounds for your objection
• be supported by relevant evidence
• have new evidence to support your objection, which should be submitted

If your objection relies on evidence which has already been submitted to us, there is no need to re-submit that evidence and you should simply refer to it in your objection.

Relevant evidence for definitive map modification orders is the same regardless of whether you wish to support or object to a definitive map modification order. Full information on the different kinds of evidence that are relevant can be found in definitive map modification order application guidance notes.

Before submitting any objections or representations please bear the following in mind:

• definitive map modification orders are not about creating new rights of way, but are the legal process for recording rights of way which already exist; either paths that have acquired public rights through long unchallenged public use, or ways which should have been recorded on the definitive map but were left off
• definitive map modification orders are also used for amending the definitive map where a right of way has been recorded incorrectly, such as a footpath incorrectly recorded as a bridleway
• issues such as desirability or suitability of a particular route cannot be taken into account in the definitive map modification order process, and cannot be counted as valid reasons for objecting to a definitive map modification orders. Simply not wanting a particular path to be added to, deleted from or changed on the definitive map is not a reason for objecting to a definitive map modification orders